Refractometer vs floating needle
- Thread starter 90addict
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Asm481
Active Member
Swing arm is great unless there are any bubbles or any build up from drying, they also need lots of water. Refractometer is best but get some calibration fluid. Distilled is great if you run 0 for salinity! Serious get calibration fluid. Other great reason you only need a couple drops so you can test level on your fish you buy to see how far apart you are for aclimation.
Refractometer every time for me.
I would trust the Vee Gee Scientific STX-3 and the High Precision Glass Hydrometer from Tropic Marine and nothing else 
I guess I trust neither of those.
I guess I trust neither of those.
Did anyone else notice that the scale inside the refracto meter is tilted?
I see a bubble on the swingarm in the OP’s foto, fill carefully by calmly emerging it . Read it leveled with the line of the body parallel to the surface of the sample. Rinse with RODI to prevent salt complications
I see a bubble on the swingarm in the OP’s foto, fill carefully by calmly emerging it . Read it leveled with the line of the body parallel to the surface of the sample. Rinse with RODI to prevent salt complications
I’m offended by this precision snobbery against the finest piece of plastic equipment ever invented!I would trust the Vee Gee Scientific STX-3 and the High Precision Glass Hydrometer from Tropic Marine and nothing else
I have travelled with my trusty sea test ultra grade A OG Plastic salt density indicator and have enjoyed repeated validation of it in reefs around the equator.
(It has caused significant frowning from TSA agents looking through my suitcase as they ponder the question; “What is this thing and can it interfere with flight safety?”)
I use it routinely and prefer it to glass tools because the glass can be easily broken while the plastic is amazingly durable.
The other issue with refractometers is that they are heavy and take up space where the frags can fit for the flight home. TSA doesn’t allow calibration solutions in the carryons either.
FernBluffReef
Active Member
I much prefer my cheap instant ocean hydrometer. Refractometer is all over the map
I’m offended by this precision snobbery against the finest piece of plastic equipment ever invented!
I have travelled with my trusty sea test ultra grade A OG Plastic salt density indicator and have enjoyed repeated validation of it in reefs around the equator.
(It has caused significant frowning from TSA agents looking through my suitcase as they ponder the question; “What is this thing and can it interfere with flight safety?”)
I use it routinely and prefer it to glass tools because the glass can be easily broken while the plastic is amazingly durable.
The other issue with refractometers is that they are heavy and take up space where the frags can fit for the flight home. TSA doesn’t allow calibration solutions in the carryons either.
ha ha, well the veegee doesn't ever seem to need recalibration as it is not prone to drifting so no problem there
When I started I used the hobby grade glass hydrometers and they are also reasonably accurate (and easy enough to make repeatable batches of water with). The really good ones are accurate and precise but I am so clumsy I can’t afford to use them. The more expensive they are the fast I find a way to break them.ha ha, well the veegee doesn't ever seem to need recalibration as it is not prone to drifting so no problem there
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2017
- Messages
- 2,200
- Reaction score
- 4,115
I very much like the Milwaukee digital refractometer. It’s super easy to use and read, seems accurate, comes with calibration fluid, and was reasonably affordable.
Milwaukee Digital Refractometer at BRS
Milwaukee Digital Refractometer at BRS
Randy Holmes-Farley
Reef Chemist
Staff member
Super Moderator
Excellence Award
Expert Contributor
Article Contributor
R2R Research
My Tank Thread
When I tested a deep six swing arm years ago, it did a good job of correcting temp issues, but was off in absolute terms:
reefs.com
So how do these hydrometers measure up? In my tank the water was measured to be S=35 ± 0.5 by conductivity. Using the Deep Six swing arm hydrometer I got readings of S=32.5 ± 0.5 at 81 °F and S=32 ± 0.5 at 68 °F. Using the SeaTest I got S=34.5 ± 0.5 at 81 °F and S=34 ± 0.5 at 68 °F.
For the standard type Tropic Marin hydrometer, I got a 77 °F/77 °F specific gravity of about 1.0265 ± 0.0003 (Figure 4), which compares well to the expected value of 1.0264.
Chemistry and the Aquarium: Specific Gravity: Oh How Complicated!
This month, Randy explains and reviews specific gravity.
reefs.com
So how do these hydrometers measure up? In my tank the water was measured to be S=35 ± 0.5 by conductivity. Using the Deep Six swing arm hydrometer I got readings of S=32.5 ± 0.5 at 81 °F and S=32 ± 0.5 at 68 °F. Using the SeaTest I got S=34.5 ± 0.5 at 81 °F and S=34 ± 0.5 at 68 °F.
For the standard type Tropic Marin hydrometer, I got a 77 °F/77 °F specific gravity of about 1.0265 ± 0.0003 (Figure 4), which compares well to the expected value of 1.0264.
Similar threads
