Redwings vs Blackhawks

Nutramar Foods
www.dinkinsaquaticgardens.com

thomasdo87

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
590
Reaction score
8
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Chicago, IL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
the 5th goal was a open netter and the game was pretty close only four goals out 42 shots isnt bad, problem was they didnt play toews and kane as much because they were worried about match ups. Blackhawks scored the first goal and tied it up at 2 in the third period.
 
www.dinkinsaquaticgardens.com

Viva'sReef

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
1,775
Reaction score
829
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Brighton, Mi
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
the 5th goal was a open netter and the game was pretty close only four goals out 42 shots isnt bad, problem was they didnt play toews and kane as much because they were worried about match ups. Blackhawks scored the first goal and tied it up at 2 in the third period.

First off, that first goal was a fluke dumb weak butt mistake that will NOT happen again.

Secondly, Blackhawks are 0/4 in the last 4 games with Detroit, doesnt look good for Chicago when you pit Boyz vs. Men.
 

bheld1

Community Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
83
Reaction score
1
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Michigan
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The Wings have way too much experience to lose...Chicago is young and fast but this isn't going to be a stanley cup year for them. I wouldn't be shocked if Detroit were to sweep this series but chicago could pull a surprise or 2

I'll go with wings in 5 like everyone else
 

thomasdo87

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
590
Reaction score
8
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Chicago, IL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
First off, that first goal was a fluke dumb weak butt mistake that will NOT happen again.

Secondly, Blackhawks are 0/4 in the last 4 games with Detroit, doesnt look good for Chicago when you pit Boyz vs. Men.

Just because its a fluke, a goal is a goal. It still appears on the scoreboard does it not? Most the players are too young to even grow playoff beards and most of the team this is their first playoffs. Obviously they arent doing too ba being in the Conference finals, or was it a fluke they got that far?
 

Viva'sReef

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
1,775
Reaction score
829
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Brighton, Mi
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
I just don't see how Blackhawks > Redwings. Faster, and younger maybe....but Greater? Nah, not hearing that!


"Most the players are too young to even grow playoff beards and most of the team this is their first playoffs."

Yup you pretty much firmed up what I said previously.....Boys vs. Men!
 
OP
OP
schminksbro

schminksbro

Guardian of The Blue Glow
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
2,011
Reaction score
48
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Michigan
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The Hawks looked like the monkey in the middle for 2/3 of the game or more. Kane had zero shots on goal. lol Toews had 3 but nothing until the 3rd period. The Hawks are young and talented. Quick as all get out. However they seem to want to run and gun and that spells disaster for them against the Wings. The Wings will pick them apart as evidenced by all the odd man rushes yesterday.

the 5th goal was a open netter and the game was pretty close only four goals out 42 shots isnt bad, problem was they didnt play toews and kane as much because they were worried about match ups. Blackhawks scored the first goal and tied it up at 2 in the third period.
 
Orphek OR3 reef aquarium LED bar

Viva'sReef

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
1,775
Reaction score
829
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Brighton, Mi
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
redwings.jpg
 
Corals.com

ReeferGoalie

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 10, 2007
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
We already beat the toughest opponent

Why does everyone say "we" about their team, like you're doing something on the ice? Ever notice it's "we" when they're winning, but "them" when you're losing?

Does anyone here actually play hockey?

I'm also a Hawks fan, but I don't see them winning this series. They'll be a force for the next few years though.
 
Top Shelf Aquatics

Leishman

143gadgets' Mentor
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
May 18, 2007
Messages
2,062
Reaction score
1,623
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Frederick, MD
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Why does everyone say "we" about their team, like you're doing something on the ice? Ever notice it's "we" when they're winning, but "them" when you're losing?

Does anyone here actually play hockey?

I'm also a Hawks fan, but I don't see them winning this series. They'll be a force for the next few years though.

I hate my boss and partner using 'we' when they do nothing and things go well, but 'you' when things go bad. However, in sports, I think 'we' is valid. Have you ever heard of 'Home Ice Advantage'?
 
OP
OP
schminksbro

schminksbro

Guardian of The Blue Glow
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
2,011
Reaction score
48
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Michigan
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
In Chicago where hockey is the #4 sport it's "them". In Detroit where hockey is the #1 sport it's "we". Michigan is a huge hockey state which produces alot of NHL players. There are rinks and ponds all over. Alot of us grew up playing the game. You will find more educated fans in this market than in say...Pittsburgh. They actually think Crosby is gonna carry them to the cup. :snicker: At least you know the Hawks don't stand a chance.:snicker:


Why does everyone say "we" about their team, like you're doing something on the ice? Ever notice it's "we" when they're winning, but "them" when you're losing?

Does anyone here actually play hockey?

I'm also a Hawks fan, but I don't see them winning this series. They'll be a force for the next few years though.
 

Polyp polynomial: How many heads do you start with when buying zoas?

  • One head is enough to get started.

    Votes: 27 10.6%
  • 2 to 4 heads.

    Votes: 145 57.1%
  • 5 heads or more.

    Votes: 65 25.6%
  • Full colony.

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 7 2.8%
PremiumAquatics.com
Back
Top