sixty_reefer
5000 Club Member
View BadgesArticle Contributor
UK Reef Club Member
Hospitality Award
305 Reef Club
R2R Research
@taricha, @Dan_P
How could I identify the above?
I’ve tried a few things in the past and they really haven’t worked out well although this time around is starting to look that it may be a strong evidence of the existence of anabolism in a aquarium filtration if presented with different types of organic carbon.
In the last experiment I did, in the first week I’ve added 0.5 ml of vinegar’s just to confirm what happened last time we’re taricha pointed out correctly that the hole system did become anoxic allowing the hole tank becoming a ground for bacteria to respire No3. I’ve made this in hope to verify that there was no anoxic areas in the system were they could use organic carbon.
Part two I’ve allowed the bloom to stop, 2 days of a small haze and I’ve introduced a particulate form of organic carbon, this carbon under the microscope seems to be floating around the tank for a few days before it’s consumed.
My observation so far have been that the tank has a demand for nitrogen that goes in line with the dose of particulate organic carbon. I’ve recently doubled the dose of carbon and nitrogen demand increase by two fold to be able to keep nitrate detectable at 5ppm, there hasn’t been a demand for phosphate since the test started or if it has it wasn’t significant to see it in the test kits (very accurate in past tests).
The water has been cristal clear with a fairly high ph (8.2) and oxygen levels have been at 10 mg/l plus.
Just wondering what additional test I should be doing in order to determine if I’m in the right way?
How could I identify the above?
I’ve tried a few things in the past and they really haven’t worked out well although this time around is starting to look that it may be a strong evidence of the existence of anabolism in a aquarium filtration if presented with different types of organic carbon.
In the last experiment I did, in the first week I’ve added 0.5 ml of vinegar’s just to confirm what happened last time we’re taricha pointed out correctly that the hole system did become anoxic allowing the hole tank becoming a ground for bacteria to respire No3. I’ve made this in hope to verify that there was no anoxic areas in the system were they could use organic carbon.
Part two I’ve allowed the bloom to stop, 2 days of a small haze and I’ve introduced a particulate form of organic carbon, this carbon under the microscope seems to be floating around the tank for a few days before it’s consumed.
My observation so far have been that the tank has a demand for nitrogen that goes in line with the dose of particulate organic carbon. I’ve recently doubled the dose of carbon and nitrogen demand increase by two fold to be able to keep nitrate detectable at 5ppm, there hasn’t been a demand for phosphate since the test started or if it has it wasn’t significant to see it in the test kits (very accurate in past tests).
The water has been cristal clear with a fairly high ph (8.2) and oxygen levels have been at 10 mg/l plus.
Just wondering what additional test I should be doing in order to determine if I’m in the right way?