HANNAH-API-RED SEA weird results!!

jordimex

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 19, 2017
Messages
457
Reaction score
152
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So today a couple friends came to my house and are really knowledgeable about both marine and fresh water tanks, they are from argentina and brazil they came to the house for a beer and to talk about corals and fish,
one of the guys told me that he wanted to test my water so i handed him all my test kits
he did 3 red sea calcium tests and got a result saying my calcium was under 290
i did 1 api test and got a result of 380
i did 2 test with my Hannah checker and got 1 result of 511 and another one for 490
he did the test down to a T same as me how are this results posible!! and which one should i trust
tomorrow ill be getting a salifert test to see what it says

any advice?
 
AS

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,262
Reaction score
2,726
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Average them out and you're set.

Reagents do go bad or come bad. Happens with all kits. The red sea is either bad or not done right. I found API kit to be reliable and accurate enough. I don't have any experience with thr hanna but others seem to have had troubles with that one.
 
Nutramar Foods

Martin Kuhn

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
228
Reaction score
106
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Average them out and you're set.

I don't agree. Results are strongly different.

Without having measured a sample with EXACTLY KNOWN Ca concentration, you can't which test kits measures correct or how far it is off.

I suggest to buy a Ca-reference or, better, a salt water multi reference and measure with all test kits. Then you know.
 

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,262
Reaction score
2,726
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It was sarcasm as the next statement was in belief that the redsea reading is inaccurate. Otherwise I would have no issue with averaging the API and hanna numbers. Both strike an acceptable range.
 
AS

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
Review score
+3 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,007
Reaction score
37,448
Review score
+3 /0 /-0
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lol!!!

I'd trust the API over the hanna cal for a ball part #. :D
Got in my first bad refill on the Red Red Pro cal ever, at the first of the year. :(
 

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
Review score
+3 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,007
Reaction score
37,448
Review score
+3 /0 /-0
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
CLICK TO VIEW
OP
OP
jordimex

jordimex

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 19, 2017
Messages
457
Reaction score
152
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lol!!!

I'd trust the API over the hanna cal for a ball part #. :D
Got in my first bad refill on the Red Red Pro cal ever, at the first of the year. :(
i am thinking i have a bad red sea reagent or something it was the first time buying that product don't think i will ever do it again
 
OP
OP
jordimex

jordimex

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 19, 2017
Messages
457
Reaction score
152
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't agree. Results are strongly different.

Without having measured a sample with EXACTLY KNOWN Ca concentration, you can't which test kits measures correct or how far it is off.

I suggest to buy a Ca-reference or, better, a salt water multi reference and measure with all test kits. Then you know.
i will try to get salt water multi reference to see make sure
 
CLICK TO VIEW

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,262
Reaction score
2,726
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A good reference solution can be handy and can be made. But luckily the margin of an acceptable value for our tanks is rather large.
 

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
Review score
+3 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,007
Reaction score
37,448
Review score
+3 /0 /-0
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i am thinking i have a bad red sea reagent or something it was the first time buying that product don't think i will ever do it again
Could be :(
Been using the Salifert over here. :)
 
Top Shelf Aquatics
Top Shelf Aquatics

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
hey @Randy Holmes-Farley could there be another explanation apart from the test reagents gone bad?

User error. :D

I've done lots of tests, leaving out a step. Some people read syringes backwards or incorrectly, misremember volumes to use, cross contaminate equipment, etc. All sorts of things.

The 290 ppm sounds off, regardless of the method. It is very rare for a reef tank to get that low.
 

Polyp polynomial: How many heads do you start with when buying zoas?

  • One head is enough to get started.

    Votes: 27 10.6%
  • 2 to 4 heads.

    Votes: 145 57.1%
  • 5 heads or more.

    Votes: 65 25.6%
  • Full colony.

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 7 2.8%
Back
Top