I keep thinking about why it seems as though freshwater fish diseases seem less-commonly talked about compared to saltwater fish diseases and was wondering if anyone else had any insights/thoughts.
My guesses on why this is were that:
a. Freshwater fish might be more disease resilient as they live in smaller bodies of water and might therefore face higher pathogen concentrations
b. The freshwater hobby is more widespread than the saltwater hobby and would proportionally host more inexperienced hobbyists and companies that target these inexperienced hobbyists that ignore/downplay/are vocal about fish disease
On a separate thread, @Sharkbait19 mentioned that:
c. Freshwater fish are usually cheaper than their saltwater counterparts
d. More freshwater fish are being captive-bred in disease-free environments compared to saltwater fish as opposed to originating in the wild
My guesses on why this is were that:
a. Freshwater fish might be more disease resilient as they live in smaller bodies of water and might therefore face higher pathogen concentrations
b. The freshwater hobby is more widespread than the saltwater hobby and would proportionally host more inexperienced hobbyists and companies that target these inexperienced hobbyists that ignore/downplay/are vocal about fish disease
On a separate thread, @Sharkbait19 mentioned that:
c. Freshwater fish are usually cheaper than their saltwater counterparts
d. More freshwater fish are being captive-bred in disease-free environments compared to saltwater fish as opposed to originating in the wild