Dose anyone have a Aquaforest oceanguard

BRS
Top Shelf Aquatics
Top Shelf Aquatics

HBtank

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2022
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
2,209
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Huntington Beach
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Was looking at these recently too. I know it's common now (e.g. red sea tanks), but there is something about the front glass not being on the stand that sketches me out.
All sides are like that. It’s hard for me to just accept that it’s OK. I think Redsea doesn’t on the largest tanks? Not following that logic, makes me think it isn’t as strong (the important part) but you can get away with it on smaller tanks to get that clean look for the doors? Eh…

One reason why I started looking at Cade instead of AF for a new tank, but Cade also has an awesome built in solution for electrical that makes it the winner for me, as well as being more proven (i.e. this thread). The sumps on the AF are pretty sweet though. Both systems seemed a notch above the rest, but Cade just seems like they thought a little more of it through.. but they also cost a bit more.
 
Last edited:
www.dinkinsaquaticgardens.com

Chrisv.

2500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 17, 2012
Messages
3,167
Reaction score
3,765
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
All sides are like that. It’s hard for me to just accept that it’s OK. I think Redsea doesn’t on the largest tanks? Not following that logic, makes me think it isn’t as strong (the important part) but you can get away with it on smaller tanks to get that clean look for the doors? Eh…

One reason why I started looking at Cade instead of AF for a new tank, but Cade also has an awesome built in solution for electrical that makes it the winner for me, as well as being more proven (i.e. this thread). The sumps on the AF are pretty sweet though. Both systems seemed a notch above the rest, but Cade just seems like they thought a little more of it through.. but they also cost a bit more.
Red sea does do it on the big ones!

This is certainly a design choice, not something that coincidental. I wish some engineers could chime in.

The AF marketing materials describe the stand as being extremely overbuilt...which just seems like an odd claim to make to me given the layout.

Perhaps the issue is that with the "floating bottom" tank design (vs stacked, where the glass panels rest on the bottom) there is a riak that the bottom will press down under weight of the water, and the sides would be pressed down too, but doing so would put shear pressure on the silicone joints. Could imagine this circumstance if the tank were on a foam pad that didn't equally compress. Wondering if it's actually better to have the walls over hanging if they are not sitting on the tank bottom.
@Aquaforest, do you have any engineers who can comment?
 

Daniel@R2R

Living the Reef Life
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Nov 18, 2012
Messages
36,154
Reaction score
58,478
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Fontana, California
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
BRS

HBtank

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2022
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
2,209
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Huntington Beach
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Safe to assume from the username that he has more than one (as a member of the company that makes them)?

Would love to understand this design a little better.
I don’t think it is to prevent issues, as these tanks are the odd ones out (seems WB, AF, and RS have these designs, at least the front) and floating is common. AF tanks take it further and add the sides to it. If they were fully supported all the way to the edge, there should be no issues. Of course if the leveling mat or top of the stand is not uniform, that is an issue, but that is likely a problem for any tank.

It’s the opposite IMO, that they made a design choice to have these clean looking doors and do not think the downward sheer force on the unsupported outside panels is a problem. Well I guess unless it’s a certain size and you are RedSea.
 
Last edited:

HBtank

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2022
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
2,209
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Huntington Beach
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So without doing the full calcs, it looks like the sheer force of the weight of glass are around two orders of magnitude less than the hydrostatic force pushing out on the front panel of the tank. Since a piece of glass has thickness, I also thought about if a stand supporting the bottom would help in the case of a failure at the top of the tank, but the equal force is about 1/3 up the from the bottom, so the bottom should fail first.

So I think the general rationale on these designs are that if you are going to trust silicone to hold 1000s of pounds of force outward (assuming a 4x2 front), another 50 lbs of sheer force isn’t all that much.

All this made me decide is that at a certain size I will have bracing on a tank. Trusting those single sets of silicone seals on large rimless tanks is kind of crazy when you think about it, the amount of silicone doesn’t really scale with the forces as you go larger.
 

gmoney243

2500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
May 30, 2011
Messages
4,390
Reaction score
98
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Lavergne
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I just started a build thread for my AF 605

 
BRS

Polyp polynomial: How many heads do you start with when buying zoas?

  • One head is enough to get started.

    Votes: 27 10.6%
  • 2 to 4 heads.

    Votes: 145 57.1%
  • 5 heads or more.

    Votes: 65 25.6%
  • Full colony.

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 7 2.8%
Dinkins Aquatic Gardens
Back
Top