Comparison of pH probes

AI Hydra

JulesH

Community Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
67
Reaction score
40
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Torquay, UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi,

I have an interesting issue with my pH probes. I have two probes in the sump of my 320 litre frag tank, one made by reef factory (probably better known in Europe/UK) and the second device by Neptune running in conjunction with my Apex.

Both are calibrated, the Apex probe with the 7 and 10 solutions, whilst the reef factory probe uses 4 and 7 solutions. I was hoping that Reef factory were going to change their calibration solutions to bracket sea water values, but that has not happened yet.

Here is the conundrum, the reef factory reads higher than the Apex probe by approximately 0.46 of a pH measurement. I have recorded and graphed a 24 hour period of both probes. I dose Kalk overnight, only 0.5 litre. I am trying to figure out which probe is giving me a more accurate representation of my tank's pH? As you can see both curves follow each other quite well.

Thanks for looking

Julian

chart.jpg
 
Top Shelf Aquatics

Bleigh

The lich queen
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Messages
8,644
Reaction score
21,765
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Charlotte, NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You could purchase some reference standards on amazon and determine which one is most accurate from that. Another option is to look at the percentage error for both probes. You can add that to your plot and determine the overlapping portion to be most reflective of the "true" ph.
 
OP
OP
JulesH

JulesH

Community Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
67
Reaction score
40
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Torquay, UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Bleigh, thanks for your reply. I am going to buy some third party reference standards when I get home, ones that will cover the 4, 7 and 10 used by both probes. I shall look into the the instrument associated errors.

Julian
 
Top Shelf Aquatics

Dburr1014

5000 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2016
Messages
6,056
Reaction score
5,874
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
CT
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Bleigh, thanks for your reply. I am going to buy some third party reference standards when I get home, ones that will cover the 4, 7 and 10 used by both probes. I shall look into the the instrument associated errors.

Julian
You can also make reference standards from house hold items.
Or just use the 7 and 10 and see if they read right, right now without re-calibrating.
 

gbroadbridge

2500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Messages
2,814
Reaction score
2,804
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Sydney, Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi,

I have an interesting issue with my pH probes. I have two probes in the sump of my 320 litre frag tank, one made by reef factory (probably better known in Europe/UK) and the second device by Neptune running in conjunction with my Apex.

Both are calibrated, the Apex probe with the 7 and 10 solutions, whilst the reef factory probe uses 4 and 7 solutions. I was hoping that Reef factory were going to change their calibration solutions to bracket sea water values, but that has not happened yet.

Here is the conundrum, the reef factory reads higher than the Apex probe by approximately 0.46 of a pH measurement. I have recorded and graphed a 24 hour period of both probes. I dose Kalk overnight, only 0.5 litre. I am trying to figure out which probe is giving me a more accurate representation of my tank's pH? As you can see both curves follow each other quite well.

Thanks for looking

Julian

View attachment 2994346
If you dissolve 3.8 g of household Borax in a litre of water you will have pretty close to pH 9.19 reference.
 
OP
OP
JulesH

JulesH

Community Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
67
Reaction score
40
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Torquay, UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi all,

I am back from my travels I have recalibrated both my pH probes with 4, 7 and 10 pH standards. Attached is another 24 hour comparison dataset of my two probes. As mentioned previously they both follow the pH trend pretty well. I have not been able to ascertain the accuracies of the two instruments, thus I am not able to weight the probes accordingly.
Ph probe comparison.png


If you look at the graph I have included a median line. I was thinking of using the median as my actual pH level for my Kalk dosing.

Is this feasible?

Thanks for looking

Julian
 
Nutramar Foods

gbroadbridge

2500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Messages
2,814
Reaction score
2,804
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Sydney, Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi all,

I am back from my travels I have recalibrated both my pH probes with 4, 7 and 10 pH standards. Attached is another 24 hour comparison dataset of my two probes. As mentioned previously they both follow the pH trend pretty well. I have not been able to ascertain the accuracies of the two instruments, thus I am not able to weight the probes accordingly.View attachment 3050258

If you look at the graph I have included a median line. I was thinking of using the median as my actual pH level for my Kalk dosing.

Is this feasible?

Thanks for looking

Julian
I don't see that it matters.

Pick either.
 
AI Nero 5

Polyp polynomial: How many heads do you start with when buying zoas?

  • One head is enough to get started.

    Votes: 27 10.6%
  • 2 to 4 heads.

    Votes: 145 57.1%
  • 5 heads or more.

    Votes: 65 25.6%
  • Full colony.

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 7 2.8%
Tropic Marin USA
Back
Top