Battling phosphate and gfo

frankieg2293

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2022
Messages
180
Reaction score
58
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
long island NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been battling phosphate for months,
Main reason I think is I got a used tank a year and a half ago.. and I reused all the sand and rock from last owner. I may have been able to reuse rock but I know I screwed up using the sand.
anyways. I’m in this now, so I have been using GFO in a reactor. And it’s not helping as much as I’d like.
is there a more efficient way to battle this.? My phos hovers around .08- 2.0 ppm I’d really like to keep it lower for obvious reasons.
maybe I should replace sand? Or maybe there is a chemical option?
 
Corals.com

Viking_Reefing

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 4, 2018
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
1,922
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Vacuum out all the gunk from the sandbed will be step one. Removing it might cause more issues now that it’s there.

However, there must be something wrong with the implementation of the GFO. Either not using enough or the wrong setup. GFO can easily strip all the po4 out of the system in no time at all.
 

Dennis Cartier

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Aug 25, 2016
Messages
1,888
Reaction score
2,305
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Brampton, Ontario
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been battling phosphate for months,
Main reason I think is I got a used tank a year and a half ago.. and I reused all the sand and rock from last owner. I may have been able to reuse rock but I know I screwed up using the sand.
anyways. I’m in this now, so I have been using GFO in a reactor. And it’s not helping as much as I’d like.
is there a more efficient way to battle this.? My phos hovers around .08- 2.0 ppm I’d really like to keep it lower for obvious reasons.
maybe I should replace sand? Or maybe there is a chemical option?
It depends if the range you have in your post is accurate (0.08 - 2.0 ppm). I suspect you might have misplaced the decimal and really mean 0.2 ppm. If so, it really is 0.2 ppm, then GFO is probably the easiest method to employ.

For higher PO4 levels, than Lanthanum Chloride (LaCl) becomes much cheaper and easier to use for bringing down PO4. However it does come with risks to your livestock if appropriate measures are not employed. I strongly suggest reading the various threads on using Lanthanum before contemplating using it to be informed of the risks and how to mitigate them.
 
Top Shelf Aquatics

gbroadbridge

2500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Messages
2,814
Reaction score
2,804
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Sydney, Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been battling phosphate for months,
Main reason I think is I got a used tank a year and a half ago.. and I reused all the sand and rock from last owner. I may have been able to reuse rock but I know I screwed up using the sand.
anyways. I’m in this now, so I have been using GFO in a reactor. And it’s not helping as much as I’d like.
is there a more efficient way to battle this.? My phos hovers around .08- 2.0 ppm I’d really like to keep it lower for obvious reasons.
maybe I should replace sand? Or maybe there is a chemical option?
Phosphate binds to carbonate surfaces such as rock and substrate.
They can act as a reservoir for an awful lot of Phosphate.

The GFO is working fine, but as quickly as it is removing phosphate more is being released from the reservoir.
You simply need to keep it up and it will slowly reduce, which may take many months.

You could use Lanthanum Chloride as others have pointed out. It works by precipitating the phosphate out of solution and then the precipitate needs to be mechanically removed using very fine filter socks. If not removed it will pollute the tank.

Another alternative is an Aluminium Oxide based Phosphate remover such as Phosguard.
Personally, I would use that in preference to Lanthanum Chloride.
 
OP
OP
frankieg2293

frankieg2293

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2022
Messages
180
Reaction score
58
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
long island NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It depends if the range you have in your post is accurate (0.08 - 2.0 ppm). I suspect you might have misplaced the decimal and really mean 0.2 ppm. If so, it really is 0.2 ppm, then GFO is probably the easiest method to employ.

For higher PO4 levels, than Lanthanum Chloride (LaCl) becomes much cheaper and easier to use for bringing down PO4. However it does come with risks to your livestock if appropriate measures are not employed. I strongly suggest reading the various threads on using Lanthanum before contemplating using it to be informed of the risks and how to mitigate them.
I did misplace. Decimal
 
AS

Polyp polynomial: How many heads do you start with when buying zoas?

  • One head is enough to get started.

    Votes: 27 10.6%
  • 2 to 4 heads.

    Votes: 145 57.1%
  • 5 heads or more.

    Votes: 65 25.6%
  • Full colony.

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 7 2.8%
JASON FOX SIGNATURE CORALS
Back
Top