Ammonia breakdown time?

BRS

MarcosTacos

Community Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Oct 17, 2022
Messages
69
Reaction score
50
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Quebec
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I purchased 3 pieces of live rock from someone, the rock has been sitting in his sump for a couple of years.

The rock had some brittle stars, possibly other hitchhikers on it.

I placed it in a tub of freshly mixed saltwater with a heater and powerhead last night, and added somme bottled ammonia to bring it up to 2ppm ammonia.

Today I tested and ammonia is still at 2 ppm, no nitrites, it's been around 12 hours.

Should I be seeing nitrites at this point, or is this normal?
 
Top Shelf Aquatics

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
27,374
Reaction score
21,925
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
change all the water out, and simply use that rock it's skip cycle rock. sitting in a sump didn't lower it's bacteria. unless you have a digital seneye test kit for ammonia, any kit you're using is simply overpowered by the initial large ammonia loading and can't show you the resolve rates anyway. I have threads where 3 year old reef tanks showed 2.0 ppm on api, or red sea, or on a seachem badge/all non digital test kits.

the reading means nothing, only the rock origin matters. it was sitting in the sump of a running reef tank, with animals in it for a long time, is that part correct>

you don't recycle that kind of rock, it skip cycle transfers into the new tank when you lift it over and set it in. non digital test kits mean absolutely nothing, I have 2-3 more threads handy where a years old reef tank said 8 ppm and the keeper went sideways thinking their cycle died. if you had seneye, you'd be getting fully different readings on the digital nh3 system.


look at that thread solely devoted to setting up entire day 1 reefs on skip cycle rock, yours isn't even a start over its simply adding rock to current rock...you don't even have to have cycled rock for that-you could be adding dry rock and it wouldnt matter.

that thread shows plainly that you don't test, verify or proof wet live rocks from a living biosystem-you just transfer them over and continue. to use non digital test kits is everyone's stalled cycle. it never happens on a calibrated digital nh3 meter/seneye or hanna.
 
Last edited:

exnisstech

2500 Club Member
Review score
+2 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
3,611
Reaction score
4,204
Review score
+2 /0 /-0
Location
North Central Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What ammonia test kit are you using? On a recent cycle I found salifert to be more accurate that api. I also watch for nitrates. I don't bother watching nitrites. If I see a nitrates I consider it cycled and move forward, slowly tho.
 

vetteguy53081

Well known Member and monster tank lover
Review score
+12 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
79,320
Reaction score
171,014
Review score
+12 /0 /-0
Location
Wisconsin - Florida delayed due 2 hurricane damage
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
I purchased 3 pieces of live rock from someone, the rock has been sitting in his sump for a couple of years.

The rock had some brittle stars, possibly other hitchhikers on it.

I placed it in a tub of freshly mixed saltwater with a heater and powerhead last night, and added somme bottled ammonia to bring it up to 2ppm ammonia.

Today I tested and ammonia is still at 2 ppm, no nitrites, it's been around 12 hours.

Should I be seeing nitrites at this point, or is this normal?
I would monitor the ammonia and assure you see steady declines of ammonia. Typically with the ammonia you added, ammonia will rise then fall and nitrate will rise and fall which is normal. When fish are added, the bacteria population will increase with the new bio load, converting waste to nitrate.
 
BRS

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
27,374
Reaction score
21,925
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
for these reasons:

we're on year 3 handling live rock via prediction vs verification with non digital kits = causes doubt in cycling always

by being assertive with skip cycling vs cautious and using misreading name brand kits, it helps in your overall reefing confidence and procedure and design abilities to know which kind of cycle needs zero help. this kind of rock you used, found in all examples in our thread devoted solely to this kind of setup, needs zero verification and cannot ever starve if kept simply wet.


adding 2 ppm ammonia to rocks already cycled is poisoning animals that don't need tested, the worms and stars you noted. though the live rock handles the ammonia blast faster than your test kit can read it, that was an unhelpful burn at the start. those animals included are benthic cues/proofs that your rock was skip cycled and done already.

if algae is potentiated on the rock, this 2ppm feeds it.

you can see from the thread live rocks can't starve of their filter bacteria, it doesn't occur, those rocks are loaded with 20 years of food permanently etched in the crevices (waste loading organics, waste from animals deposited in the crevices etc). what you're doing is for dry rock cycling only, when starting a new tank. be sure and read the thread it'll help distinguish live rock vs dry rock cycling
 
Last edited:

vetteguy53081

Well known Member and monster tank lover
Review score
+12 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
79,320
Reaction score
171,014
Review score
+12 /0 /-0
Location
Wisconsin - Florida delayed due 2 hurricane damage
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
What ammonia test kit are you using? On a recent cycle I found salifert to be more accurate that api
Api almost always reads low when numbers are higher. Salifert or Hanna more reliable and if you want to verify your api results, simply take a water sample to a store that does NOT use Api kits and have them test your ammonia and nitrates and compare readings- then you'll know where your levels truly are at
 
www.dinkinsaquaticgardens.com

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't really hive the ro water to make a water change atm. so I will continue testing and see if I can detect some nitrites in the following hours.

The important thing is the ammonia decline, whether you ever detect nitrite or not, but it doesn't hurt to measure it.
 
BRS

Polyp polynomial: How many heads do you start with when buying zoas?

  • One head is enough to get started.

    Votes: 27 10.6%
  • 2 to 4 heads.

    Votes: 145 57.1%
  • 5 heads or more.

    Votes: 65 25.6%
  • Full colony.

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 7 2.8%

New Posts

The Random Flow Generator® Nozzle by VCA
Back
Top